Following a campaign promise, Trump – a climate denier who claimed climate change was a “hoax” committed by China – announced in June 2017 his intention to withdraw the United States from the Paris Agreement. But despite the president`s statement from the rose garden that “we`re going out,” it`s not that easy. The withdrawal process requires the agreement to be in force for three years before a country can formally announce its intention to leave. Then he will have to wait a year before leaving the pact. This means that the United States could officially leave on November 4, 2020 at the earliest, one day after the presidential election. Even a formal withdrawal would not necessarily be permanent, experts say; A future president could return to the board in just one month. From November 30 to November 11. In December 2015, France hosted representatives from 196 countries at the United Nations Climate Change Conference, one of the largest and most ambitious global climate conferences ever held. The goal was nothing less than a binding, universal agreement that would limit greenhouse gas emissions to levels that would prevent global temperatures from rising more than 2°C (3.6°F) above the temperature scale set before the start of the Industrial Revolution. Following the conclusion of COP 21 (the 21st session of the Conference of the Parties presiding over the Conference) on 12 December 2015, the final text of the Paris Agreement was adopted by common agreement between all 195 Member States participating in the UNFCCC and the European Union in order to reduce emissions as part of the greenhouse gas reduction methodology.
In the 12-page agreement, members pledged to reduce their carbon emissions “as quickly as possible” and to do their best to keep global warming “well below 2°C” [3.6°F].  Concrete results of the increased focus on adaptation financing in Paris include the announcement by G7 countries to provide $420 million for climate risk insurance and the launch of an early warning and climate risk systems (CREWS) initiative.  In 2016, the Obama administration awarded a $500 million grant to the Green Climate Fund as “the first part of a $3 billion commitment made at the Paris climate negotiations.”    To date, the Green Climate Fund has received more than $10 billion in pledges. In particular, commitments come from industrialized countries such as France, the United States and Japan, but also from developing countries such as Mexico, Indonesia and Vietnam.  Ultimately, the objective of the agreement is to keep the global average temperature rise below 2 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels. Joining the agreement means that countries are required to plan and report on their efforts to reduce global warming and emissions. Seven other countries have signed the Paris Agreement but have not ratified it. A study published in 2018 indicates a threshold at which temperatures could reach 4 or 5 degrees (ambiguous expression, continuity would be “4-5°C”) compared to pre-industrial levels, thanks to self-reinforcing feedbacks in the climate system, suggesting that this threshold is below the 2-degree temperature target agreed in the Paris Climate Agreement. Study author Katherine Richardson points out: “We note that the Earth has never had a near-stable state in its history that is about 2°C warmer than the pre-industrial state and suggest that there is a significant risk that the system itself will `want` additional warming due to all these other processes – even if we stop emissions. This means not only reducing emissions, but much more.  Indeed, research clearly shows that the costs of climate inaction far outweigh the costs of reducing carbon pollution. A recent study suggests that if the United States fails to meet its Paris climate goals, it could cost the economy up to $6 trillion in the coming decades.
A global failure to meet the NDCs currently set out in the agreement could reduce global GDP by more than 25% by the end of the century. At the same time, another study estimates that meeting – or even exceeding – the Paris targets through infrastructure investments in clean energy and energy efficiency could have huge global benefits – around $19 trillion. “Oil has been an important factor in economic security for many of these countries,” David Waskow of the World Resources Institute think tank in Washington told CHN, highlighting the common interests of OPEC countries and the United States, the world`s largest oil producer. Although the agreement was welcomed by many, including French President François Hollande and UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon, criticism also surfaced. For example, James Hansen, a former NASA scientist and climate change expert, expressed anger that most of the deal is made up of “promises” or goals, not firm commitments.  He called the Paris talks a fraud with “nothing to do, only to promise” and believes that only a general tax on CO2 emissions, which is not part of the Paris Agreement, would reduce CO2 emissions fast enough to avoid the worst effects of global warming.  Here`s a look at what the Paris Agreement does, how it works, and why it`s so important to our future. The extent to which each country is on track to meet its commitments under the Paris Agreement can be continuously tracked online (via the Climate Action Tracker and the Climate Clock).
On the other side of the debate are the head of the Environmental Protection Agency, Scott Pruitt, a virulent anti-climate extremist, and chief strategist Steve Bannon, who is widely credited with shaping the president`s nationalist views and fueling his distrust of international agreements. Another important difference between the Paris Agreement and the Kyoto Protocol is their scope. The SDG provides the framework for the future of the Clean Development Mechanism after Kyoto (in 2020). [needs to be updated] Among other things, countries must report on their greenhouse gas inventories and progress towards their targets so that external experts can assess their success. Countries should also reconsider their commitments by 2020 and set new targets every five years, with the aim of further reducing emissions. They must participate in a “global stocktaking” to measure collective efforts to achieve the long-term goals of the Paris Agreement. At the same time, developed countries must also estimate the amount of financial support they will provide to developing countries to help them reduce their emissions and adapt to the effects of climate change. .